Bibliography

Arbaugh, F., Smith, P., Boyle, J., Stylianides G. J., & Steele, M. (2018). We reason and we prove for all mathematics: Building students’ critical thinking. Corwin, SAGE Publications.

Chan, J., Fancourt, N., & Guilfoyle, L. (2020). Argumentation in religious education in England: An analysis of Locally Agreed Syllabuses. British Journal of Religious Education, DOI:10.1080/01416200.2020.1734916

Erduran, S. (Ed.) (2007). Editorial: Argument, Discourse and Interactivity. Special Issue of School Science Review, 88(324), 29-30.

Erduran, S. (Ed.) (2019). Argumentation in Chemistry Education: Research, Policy and Practice. London: Royal Society of Chemistry.

Erduran, S., Guilfoyle, L., Park, W., Chan, J., & Fancourt, N. (2019). Argumentation and Interdisciplinarity: Reflections from the Oxford Argumentation in Religion and Science Project. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 1, 8.

Erduran, S., & Jimenez-Aleixandre, M. P. (Eds.) (2007). Argumentation in Science Education: Perspectives from Classroom-Based Research. Dordrecht: Springer. 285p. ISBN: 978-1-4020-6669-6)

Erduran, S., & Kaya, E. (2016). Scientific argumentation and deliberative democracy: an incompatible mix in school science? Theory into Practice, 55:4, 302-310. DOI: 10.1080/00405841.2016.1208067

Erduran, S., & Msimanga, A. (2014). Science curriculum reform in South Africa: Lessons for professional development from research on argumentation in science education, Education as Change, 18(S1), pp.S33-S46.

Erduran, S., Ozdem, Y., & Park, J. Y. (2015). Research trends on argumentation in science education: a journal content analysis from 1998-2014. International Journal of STEM Education, 2:5, 12 pages. doi:10.1186/s40594-015-0020-1

Erduran, S., & Villamanan, R. (2009). Cool argument: engineering students' arguments about thermodynamics in the context of Peltier effect in refrigeration. Educación Química, 20(2), pp.119-125. (Special Issue on Argumentation in Science Education)

Guilfoyle, L., Erduran, S., & Park, W. (2020) An investigation into secondary teachers’ views of argumentation in science and religious education, Journal of Beliefs and Values. DOI: 10.1080/13617672.2020.1805925

Kelly, G.J. & Takao, A. (2002). Epistemic levels in argument: An analysis of university oceanography students’ use of evidence in writing. Science Education, 86(3), 314– 342.

Lazarou, D., Erduran, S., & Sutherland, R. (2017). Argumentation in science education as an evolving concept: following the object of activity. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction. 14, 51-66.

Lazarou, D., Sutherland, R., & Erduran, S. (2016). Argumentation in science education as a systemic activity: An activity-theoretical perspective, International Journal of Educational Research 79, pp. 150-156.

Loui, R. P. (2005). A citation-based reflection on Toulmin and argument. Argumentation, 19: 259–266.

Mariotti, M. A., Durand-Guerrier, V., & Stylianides, G. J. (2018). Argumentation and proof. In T. Dreyfus, M. Artigue, D. Potari, S. Prediger, & K. Ruthven (Eds.), Developing research in mathematics education - twenty years of communication, cooperation and collaboration in Europe (pp. 75-89). Oxon, UK: Routledge - New Perspectives on Research in Mathematics Education - ERME series, Vol. 1.

Martín-Gámez, C., & Erduran, S. (2018): Understanding argumentation about socio-scientific issues on energy: a quantitative study with primary pre-service teachers in Spain, Research in Science & Technological Education, 36(4), pp. 463-483.

Ozdem, Y., Cakiroglu, J., Ertepinar, H., & Erduran, S. (2013). The nature of pre-service science teachers’ argumentation in inquiry-oriented laboratory context. International Journal of Science Education, 35(15), 2559-2586.

Ozdem, Y., Cakiroglu, J., Ertepinar, H., & Erduran, S. (2017). The pedagogy of argumentation in science education: Science teachers’ instructional practices, International Journal of Science Education, 39(11), 1443–1464. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1336807

Pabuccu, A., & Erduran, S. (2017). Beyond rote learning in organic chemistry: The infusion and impact of argumentation in tertiary education. International Journal of Science Education. 39(9), 1154-1172. DOI: 10.1080/09500693.2017.1319988

Sandefur, J., Mason, J., Stylianides, G. J., & Watson, A. (2013). Generating and using examples in the proving process. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 83(3), 323-340.

Stylianides, G. J. (2008a). An analytic framework of reasoning-and-proving. For the Learning of Mathematics, 28(1), 9-16.

Stylianides, G. J. (2008b). Proof in school mathematics curriculum: A historical perspective. Mediterranean Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 7(1), 23-50.

Stylianides, G. J. (2008c). Investigating the guidance offered to teachers in curriculum materials: The case of proof in mathematics. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 6, 191-215.

Stylianides, G. J. (2009). Reasoning-and-proving in school mathematics textbooks. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 11, 258-288.

Stylianides, G. J. (2014). Textbook analyses on reasoning-and-proving: Significance and methodological challenges. International Journal of Educational Research, 64, 63-70.

Stylianides, A. J., Bieda, K. N., & Morselli, F. (2016). Proof and argumentation in mathematics education research. In A. Gutiérrez, G. C. Leder, & P. Boero (Eds.), The second handbook of research on the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 315-351). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.

Stylianides, A. J., & Stylianides, G. J. (2009a). Learning about the nature of argument in mathematical and scientific contexts. Mediterranean Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 8, 69-80.

Stylianides, A. J., & Stylianides, G. J. (2009b). Proof constructions and evaluations. Educational Studies in Mathematics. 72(2), 237-253.

Stylianides, A. J., & Stylianides, G. J. (2018). Addressing key and persistent problems of students’ learning: The case of proof. In A. J. Stylianides, & G. Harel (Eds.), Advances in mathematics education research on proof and proving: An international perspective (99-113). Springer.

Stylianides, G. J., & Stylianides, A. J. (2009c). Facilitating the transition from empirical arguments to proof. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 40, 314-352.

Stylianides, G. J., & Stylianides, A. J. (2015). Creating a need for proof. In E. A. Silver & P. A. Kenney (Eds.), More lessons learned from research (Vol. 1, pp. 9-22). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

Stylianides, G. J., & Stylianides, A. J. (2017). Research-based interventions in the area of proof: The past, the present, and the future. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 96(2), 119-127.

Stylianides, G. J., & Stylianides, A. J. (2008). Proof in school mathematics: Insights from psychological research into students’ ability for deductive reasoning. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 10(2), 103-133.

Stylianides, G. J., Stylianides, A. J., & Philippou, G. N. (2007). Preservice teachers’ knowledge of proof by mathematical induction. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 10, 145-166.

Stylianides, G. J., Stylianides, A. J., & Shilling-Traina, L. N. (2013). Prospective teachers’ challenges in teaching reasoning-and-proving. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11, 1463-1490.

Stylianides, G. J., Sandefur, J., & Watson, A. (2016). Conditions for proving by mathematical induction to be explanatory. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 43, 20-34.

Stylianides, G. J., Stylianides, A. J., & Weber, K. (2017). Research on the teaching and learning of proof: Taking stock and moving forward. In J. Cai (Ed.), Compendium for Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 237-266). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

Toulmin (1958). Uses of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.